Staging Website
This page is connected to a test database. Data is not necessarily up-to-date and could be wiped out at any time.
Evidence matters. Find policies, programs, and systems changes that are a good fit for your community priorities.

Gender-affirming care for youth

Evidence Rating
Strategies with this rating are likely to work, but further research is needed to confirm effects. These strategies have been tested more than once and results trend positive overall.
Disparity Rating
Strategies with this rating have the potential to decrease or eliminate disparities between subgroups. Rating is suggested by evidence, expert opinion or strategy design.
Community Conditions
Clinical care
Societal Rules
Institutional practices
Laws and policies
Worldviews, culture and norms
Date Last Updated
December 9, 2025

Gender-affirming care for youth refers to the array of supports provided by a healthcare team to young people who are trans, non-binary, and gender expansive, i.e., whose gender identity differs from the sex they were assigned at birth (AAMC-Boyle 2022, AAP-Rafferty 2018). This care begins with a supportive, gender-affirming environment, where patients and their families can explore questions, concerns, and emotions, and have frank discussions with providers who present information to aid in medical decision making around developmentally appropriate care options, determining which (if any) interventions are appropriate and when, and connecting them to other supportive resources (Salvetti 2024, AAMC-Boyle 2022, AAP-Rafferty 2018).

The standard of care is described in the guidance and protocols of authoritative bodies, such as the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) and the Endocrine Society, as care and ongoing assessment by an integrated team of physicians, mental health providers and social services professionals (AAMC-Boyle 2022, WPATH-SOC 8, AAP-Rafferty 2018, Hembree 2017). Care should be individualized and provided along a continuum, from counseling to legal interventions, and can include support for social transition (such as changing a person’s name, pronouns, wardrobe, and hairstyle to align with their gender identity (Turban 2021)), non-medical resources to change appearance, speech therapy, and medical resources such as medications like puberty blockers and gender-affirming hormones (AAMC-Boyle 2022, AAP-Rafferty 2018, WPATH-SOC 8, Hembree 2017). The decision on when and if to initiate treatment is personal, involving exploring the potential risks and benefits based on each patient’s unique needs (AAP-Rafferty 2018). An individual’s gender identity may be on the binary (i.e., male or female) or non-binary. Non-binary individuals may identify as neither male nor female, a combination of both, or neither; individuals may also identify as genderqueer, genderfluid, or gender non-conforming (Kearns 2021).

Analysis of insurance data suggests that most youth diagnosed with gender dysphoria (the clinical diagnosis used for patients experiencing distress related to the incongruence between their gender identity and their sex assigned at birth) do not receive medical interventions (Hughes 2025, Dai 2024a, Reuters-Respaut 2022). For youth who do receive care, most gender-affirming medical care is provided during or after puberty; for those under 18 years old, parental consent is required (AAMC-Boyle 2022), and surgery is rarely provided to trans youth under 18 years old (Dai 2024a, AAMC-Boyle 2022). Many patients who come into care spend time with therapists and mental health professionals engaged in understanding these feelings of gender incongruence or dysphoria and assessing whether different gender affirming supports or medical treatments would be helpful (AAMC-Boyle 2022). Puberty blocker medications (gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues) can be used during this time, especially early in puberty, to suppress the release of gender incongruent sex hormones and delay or prevent development of gender incongruent permanent sex characteristics such as facial and body hair, or breast development, giving trans and non-binary patients time to explore their gender identity and how much they wish to transition (AAMC-Boyle 2022, AAP-Rafferty 2018). The effects of puberty blockers are reversible (van der Loos 2023), and these drugs have been used to treat patients with precocious puberty since the 1980s (AAP-Rafferty 2018), with a temporary pause on bone density accrual that resumes once puberty blockers are discontinued and hormone therapy begins (RAND-Dopp 2024, van der Loos 2023). If patients, their parents or guardians, and their care providers determine it is appropriate, hormone therapy (the use of estrogen, testosterone, or other analogues) can be used later in adolescence (or adulthood) to induce the development of sex characteristics more aligned with patients’ gender identity (WPATH-SOC 8, Hembree 2017, AAMC-Boyle 2022). This development occurs slowly and some changes are partially reversible if hormones are stopped (WPATH-SOC 8, Hembree 2017, AAMC-Boyle 2022).

Not all transgender or gender diverse individuals experience gender dysphoria or distress (Huit 2024, Wittlin 2023), and not all seek medical care (Huit 2024, WHO-GAC). While not all gender-affirming care is medically-focused, the available evidence is largely related to medical interventions and their impacts on trans and non-binary individuals who are able to access such care and choose to interact with the medical system.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are often considered the gold standard of scientific evidence. However, they are inappropriate in evaluating the effectiveness of gender-affirming care for youth, due to the inability to blind participants and providers to interventions over the long term, and the likelihood of study drop-out or non-adherence once patients discover they are in a control group (Ashley 2023). Observational studies are often used to study mental health outcomes, and observational evidence is regularly used for clinical decision making where RCTs are not available, including off-label drug use in pediatric practice (Ashley 2023). Just over 10% of all clinical guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics are based on well-designed and -conducted RCTs and metanalyses, while almost half are based on RCTs with minor limitations or observational studies with consistent findings (Matheny Antommaria 2025). Complementary, well-designed observational studies reduce the risks of drop out and non-adherence for highly desired interventions and can be more generalizable to real-world patient populations, and these types of studies, particularly longitudinal studies, are what this summary and analysis is based on.

What could this strategy improve?

Expected Benefits

Our evidence rating is based on the likelihood of achieving these outcomes:

  • Improved mental health

Potential Benefits

Our evidence rating is not based on these outcomes, but these benefits may also be possible:

  • Reduced suicidal ideation
  • Improved well-being

What does the research say about effectiveness? -+

There is some evidence that gender-affirming care for youth, in the form of puberty suppression and/or gender-affirming hormone therapy, can improve or maintain mental well-being and psychosocial functioning (Olson-Kennedy 2025, Chelliah 2024, Chen 2023b, Van der Miesen 2020 , Allen 2019, Costa 2015a, de Vries 2011a), reducing depression (Chelliah 2024, Green 2022, Tordoff 2022, Grannis 2021a, Achille 2020, Kuper 2020, de Vries 2011a) and suicidal ideation (Green 2022, Tordoff 2022, Turban 2022, Achille 2020, Turban 2020, Allen 2019). Most studies follow patients for 1 to 2 years of treatment, though follow-ups range from 3 months to nearly 3 years. Longer term studies to optimize safety and care are needed (Carswell 2022) and underway. In the U.S., transgender populations face discrimination, harassment, and violence based on their gender identity (Turban 2022), and this kind of minority stress, as well as worsening political hostility towards trans populations, negatively impacts the mental health of trans youth (Garcia Gutierrez 2024, Tankersley 2021, Wittlin 2023). Harms from stigmatization cannot be undone by gender-affirming care alone (Shuster 2024), and additional evidence is needed to determine how minority stress and discrimination impact the effectiveness of gender-affirming interventions at improving mental health outcomes.

Medical Care

A U.S.-based prospective cohort study suggests gender-affirming care, including puberty suppression and gender-affirming hormones, may reduce odds of depression and suicidality in transgender and non-binary youth (Tordoff 2022). A smaller longitudinal study showed similar effects in transgender youth, particularly in patients who are transfeminine (assigned male at birth) receiving puberty suppression (Achille 2020). Studies in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands suggest puberty suppression with psychological support and therapy can stabilize or improve mental and behavioral well-being in early adolescent trans patients (Carmichael 2021, Van der Miesen 2020, Costa 2015a, de Vries 2011a). U.S.-based studies, which are largely longitudinal, suggest gender-affirming hormones can improve patient mental health and well-being (Olson-Kennedy 2025, Chen 2023b, Allen 2019), decreasing depression (Chen 2023b, Green 2022, Grannis 2021a, Kuper 2020), anxiety (Chen 2023b, Grannis 2021a, Kuper 2020), and suicidality and suicidal ideation (Green 2022, Allen 2019). Gender-affirming hormones can increase body satisfaction (Chelliah 2024, Chen 2023b, Kuper 2020) and appearance congruence (Olson-Kennedy 2025, Chen 2023b, Kuper 2020), which may positively impact other mental health concerns (Olson-Kennedy 2025, Chelliah 2024, Grannis 2021a). Studies from the U.S. and Canada suggest that, overall, youth who receive puberty blockers and gender-affirming hormones are satisfied with their experience; few experience regret or dissatisfaction (RAND-Dopp 2024, Olson 2024, Crabtree 2024).

Few youth who receive puberty blocks or gender affirming hormones stop receiving all gender-affirming medical care (Olson 2024, Crabtree 2024). For example, rates of discontinuing puberty suppression and not advancing to hormone therapy appear to be 3.5% or lower across a variety of studies (RAND-Dopp 2024) and in a 2-year study of adolescents receiving gender-affirming hormones, 2.9% stopped treatment (Chen 2023b). Overall, discontinuation rates of gender-affirming hormones are low, with most studies showing discontinuation rates under 10% (Gupta 2024). Patients may discontinue hormones for many reasons that do not involve a change in gender identity, including lack of social support, bullying, desire for fertility preservation, satisfaction with the physical changes that have occurred, or problems with adherence and other barriers to care such as lack of medical insurance (Crabtree 2024, Gupta 2024). A study of referrals to an Australian pediatric gender clinic suggests that re-identification with birth sex is rare, usually occurring before or during the assessment process, and prior to starting treatment (Cavve 2024).

Responses to the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey of 27,715 transgender adults suggest that those who desired and were able to access puberty suppression or gender-affirming hormones during adolescence were less likely to experience suicidal ideation than those who wanted but did not receive this care (Turban 2022, Turban 2020). Evidence from Brazil suggests that having multiple sources of gender affirmation, including social, medical, and legal recognition can decrease depression and anxiety (Fontanari 2020). Foundational evidence from the Netherlands documented a group of young adults who had received care from a young age following the “Dutch Protocol” including psychological support, puberty suppression, gender-affirming hormones, and then, in adulthood, gender-affirming surgery (de Vries 2014). For these patients, their gender dysphoria was eliminated, psychosocial functioning improved, and their well-being matched or was better than non-trans adults (de Vries 2014). However, some experts suggest that widespread social support (from medical care, society, family, and peers) accounts for the positive outcomes of Dutch trans adolescents (de Vries 2023).

Supportive Environments and Quality of Life

Pre-adolescent transgender children who socially transition and are supported in their identities do not appear to suffer from the mental health issues reported by those who are unsupported by their families and communities (Olson 2016). Two studies looking at data from the 2015 Transgender Survey both concluded that negative experiences during K-12, such as bullying and harassment, appear to increase the risk of suicidality in adulthood (Miller 2024, Turban 2021). Having unsupportive families is associated with increased likelihood of suicide attempts (Miller 2024), while having supportive and accepting parents is associated with decreased odds of depression (Vance 2023). A study in 3 U.S. cities suggests that, for trans youth who have changed their name, there are lower odds of depression, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior when their chosen name is used in more areas of life (Russell 2018). In the Trans Youth Care United States Study, trans and non-binary youth were more likely to experience depression when not living in their affirmed gender identity, and more non-affirming experiences increased the likelihood of depression, anxiety, and suicidality (Vance 2023). Having higher levels of support from family and parents and experiencing less bullying before receiving treatment may be associated with better mental health outcomes after one year on gender-affirming hormones, compared to those with less support (Chelliah 2024).

Being able to use their chosen name, having positive relationships with parents and other sources of social support, and feeling safe and accepted at school appear to protect the mental health of trans youth (Tankersley 2021). For example, support from aunts and “other mothers” may help LGBTQ youth, including trans youth, by educating other family members and providing support and safety (Robinson 2023). Gender-affirming care can improve health-related quality of life scores for youth 10-17 years old but may not have the same impact on those receiving care who are 18-24. However, even with improvements, health-related quality of life remains lower than population standards for both groups (Gadomski 2024).

Further social and legal efforts are needed to sustain improvements to quality of life and to protect trans communities and individuals from marginalization, discrimination, and exclusion (Swan 2023). Legal and interpersonal stigma and discrimination have negative impacts on the mental health of trans and gender nonconforming youth (Garcia Gutierrez 2024, Tankersley 2021). The implementation of anti-transgender laws is associated with increased suicide attempts in trans and non-binary young people 13-24 years old by 7-72%, depending on the state, and with larger effects among those 13-17 years of age (Lee 2024). A systematic review reports that the most common risk factors for negative mental health for trans and gender non-conforming youth are having been abused (physically or verbally), discrimination, experiencing social isolation, having poor relationships with their peers, or low self-esteem, and notes that older children and adolescents are more likely to suffer from psychological distress (Tankersley 2021).

There is little evidence available for non-binary populations (Veale 2022, Kearns 2021), who have diverse needs not centered in the gender binary (Mellin 2024) which are likely different than the needs of those who are binary transgender (Sequeira 2025, Boyer 2022, Scandurra 2019). It is unclear what the impact of the “Dutch Protocol” may be for them (Preston 2024). The experiences of trans individuals who don't interact with health professionals are also largely absent from the available literature (Veale 2022). There is a need to focus beyond medical transition (Veale 2022) and to center trans and non-binary experience that includes individualized care accounting for gender-related marginalization and resilience (Huit 2024).

Barriers and Facilitators

Youth face barriers in accessing gender-affirming care, including systemic bias (Puckett 2017) and structural barriers such as cost, insurance coverage denials, difficult-to-navigate pathways to care, and the insufficient numbers of trained providers and related long wait times (Porsch-Ortega 2024). Youth also face additional restrictions on access to care due to their age and the need for parental consent (Puckett 2017) and barriers due to lack of support from family (Porsch-Ortega 2024). Youth may not know what is available to them (Porsch-Ortega 2024, Puckett 2017), such as being unaware that puberty suppression is a possibility (Puckett 2017), or how to acquire it (Porsch-Ortega 2024). In some cases, youth viewed long assessment processes prior to receipt of gender-affirming hormones as medical gatekeeping, or encountered issues with providers who did not understand non-binary identities and wanted youth to fit into a binary gender (Porsch-Ortega 2024).

Providers also face barriers, including lack of training and experience with trans youth, insurance issues, and insufficient community resources for referrals, such as mental health providers (Vance 2015). Other health system and community-level barriers include limited clinical decision support for providers, and negative biases (Sequeira 2023). Additionally, there are a limited number of gender-affirming care providers, and they are concentrated in urban areas with academic medical centers, making access for those living outside those areas even more difficult (Rodriguez 2025). Telehealth video appointments may be one solution to reaching patients residing outside of urban areas (Rodriguez 2025), and there is interest in receiving gender-affirming care in more accessible settings, such as remotely through telemedicine (Kahn 2024, Sequeira 2021) or in primary care (Kahn 2024, Sequeira 2023a, Sequeira 2021).

Recent legislative bans further decrease access to gender-affirming care for trans and non-binary youth (Sequeira 2025). Pediatric endocrinologists in states with legislation banning gender-affirming care for youth are concerned about legal action, face institutional pressure to their practice and career, and have greater concerns about their safety at work and at home than those working in states without bans (Gupta 2023). After passage of anti-transgender laws, some families with resources relocate to states without such laws, or to states with explicit shield laws, or travel there for care (Salvetti 2024). However, moving or accessing care in another state may not be an option for families with low incomes, those who rely on state programs such as Medicaid, and those from racialized backgrounds and other underserved communities (Azevedo 2023, Salvetti 2024).

How could this strategy advance health equity? This strategy is rated potential to decrease disparities: supported by some evidence. -+

Gender-affirming care has the potential to decrease disparities in mental health outcomes for trans youth, compared to the mental health of youth who are cisgender, by reducing negative mental health outcomes (Tordoff 2022, Costa 2015a, Green 2022, Turban 2022, Grannis 2021a, Van der Miesen 2020, Chen 2023b, Achille 2020, Kuper 2020, Allen 2019, de Vries 2011a, Tan 2024). Additional evidence is needed for its impact on non-binary youth. According to a 2023 nationwide survey, 3.3% of high school students are transgender, and an additional 2.2% are questioning; these students are more likely to have poor mental health and suffer from suicidality, experience violence, have unstable housing, feel less connected to their schools (MMWR-Suarez 2024), and experience family rejection than their cisgender peers (Wittlin 2023).

Mental Health Disparities and Suicidality

Trans and non-binary youth face disparities in mental health, including depression, anxiety, and suicidality, compared to their cisgender peers (Garcia Gutierrez 2024, Reisner 2015), including their cisgender sexual minority peers (Wittlin 2023), and are more likely to be bullied and harassed (Garcia Gutierrez 2024). In 2021, a survey of high school students across 18 states found that among students who identified as transgender, 71.5% reported poor mental health and 32.3% had attempted suicide (Suarez 2024). In an earlier Minnesota-based study, 20% of cisgender youth reported suicidal ideation compared to 60% of trans and gender nonconforming youth, with 31% of trans youth reporting attempting suicide (Eisenberg 2017a). A survey of transgender youth in Aotearoa/New Zealand showed that unmet need for gender-affirming care was associated with worse mental health, including double the risk of suicide attempts for those unable to receive hormones (Tan 2023).

Disparities Within the Disparities

Further disparities exist within the trans and non-binary populations. Trans youth who are Black and those who were assigned female sex at birth are the least likely to receive a gender dysphoria diagnosis and least likely to receive gender-affirming care (Kahn 2024). Trans youth with private insurance are more likely to receive gender-affirming care than those with public insurance or those using self-pay or charity care (Kahn 2024). Transmasculine (assigned female at birth) and non-binary patients report significantly more non-affirming health care experiences than patients who are transfeminine (assigned male at birth), and these non-affirming experiences are associated with health care avoidance (Boyer 2022).

Trans youth who are Black, Asian American and Pacific Islander, and Native and Indigenous report worse mental health outcomes, encounter more violence, feel less safe at school, and are more likely to encounter barriers to care than their trans counterparts who have been racialized as white (Garcia Gutierrez 2024, Azevedo 2023). One Minnesota-based study showed that transmasculine youth were more likely to be bullied than transfeminine youth (Eisenberg 2017a). In a Canada-based study, trans and non-binary youth who were Black, Indigenous, or from other racialized identities were more likely to be victims of violence, had higher odds of attempting suicide, and were more likely to forgo healthcare than their white counterparts (Chan 2023). Trans youth also experience marginalization and instability in employment, housing, and healthcare access (Garcia Gutierrez 2024, Azevedo 2023).

LGBTQ+ populations as a whole face significant health inequities (Medina-Martinez 2021, WHO-GAC). Trans and gender-diverse populations of all ages face many barriers to receiving gender-affirming care (Wittlin 2023), including discrimination in the health care system (Schall 2024, Medina-Martinez 2021), underinsurance, and poverty (Schall 2024). Trans youth face the same marginalization and discrimination that trans adults face (Garcia Gutierrez 2024). Even before recent legislative restrictions on gender-affirming care for youth were passed, trans and non-binary youth of color, those living in rural communities, and those in the Midwest and South had less access to gender-affirming care (Sequeira 2025).

What is the relevant historical background? -+

Gender-diverse individuals have existed throughout human history. The ability to use surgery or medication to align an individual’s body with their gender identity began in the early 20th century, with the work of Magnus Hirschfeld, who founded the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin in 1922 (Carswell 2022). After WWII, limited treatment was available for a small subset of adults who could be made to “fit” the gender binary (Wuest 2024), including treatment through at least 9 U.S. academic medical institutions in the 1960s and 1970s (Carswell 2022). Some transgender children received care as well (Gill-Peterson 2018). After most of those programs closed near the end of the 1970s, the organization which would become the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) was founded. Over time, the medical establishment has moved away from labeling and treating gender non-conformity as a mental illness that needed to be cured and towards a gender-affirming model; for example, the WHO’s ICD-10 (now ICD-11) adopted gender incongruence terminology (Carswell 2022).

For most of the 20th century, treatment for trans and other gender non-conforming youth was focused on “correcting” behavior and psychology, not affirming it (Wuest 2024). These gender identity and expression change efforts, also called conversion therapy or reparative therapy, are not gender-affirming care, and appear to increase suicidal ideation and the likelihood and frequency of suicide attempts both in the short and long term, and have no benefits (RAND-Dopp 2024). Expanding gender-affirming care to youth began with work in the Netherlands to adapt adult treatment guidelines for adolescent needs. It was first offered in the U.S. at Boston Children’s Hospital in 2007, and treatment guidelines specific to adolescents were first published in 2009 by the Endocrine Society. By 2014, there were 32 adolescent programs in the U.S. and by 2022 there 60 pediatric and adolescent multidisciplinary gender programs; some have now been closed due to political reasons (Carswell 2022).

State legislatures have restricted or banned access to gender-affirming care for youth in 27 states (2 of these bans, in Arkansas and Montana, have been permanently enjoined by court order) (KFF-Dawson 2025a). Many large medical organizations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the American Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, oppose such legislation (Carswell 2022). Recent efforts to ban gender-affirming care for youth stem from political and religious interests, not concerns within the medical field. Hospitals and providers have been threatened, and both providers and patients have moved to other states, which undermines evidence-based medicine and medical decision making for physicians, patients, and guardians (Preston 2024). The Cass Report, from the UK, is often used to support bans on adolescent gender affirming care, even though it does not recommend a ban and makes recommendations consistent with WPATH and Endocrine Society standards of care (Yale-McNamara 2024). Despite the justifications used by politicians in passing this legislation, this care meets conventional evidence standards for providing health care treatment (Shuster 2024).

A January 2025 executive order issued by President Trump attempts to restrict access to gender-affirming care through elimination of federal funding for healthcare institutions providing such care and eliminating coverage through federally supported insurance programs (Dowshen 2025, UCLA Law-Redfield 2025). The order also called for a report from the Department of Health and Human Services reviewing the current literature, though experts describe the resulting May 2025 report as violating scientific norms, misrepresenting the available evidence, and mischaracterizing both gender identity in youth and the current standards of care (Dowshen 2025).

In June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in U.S. v Skrmetti that Tennessee’s gender-affirming care ban could stand, as it did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Because the ruling was narrowly-based, other challenges to state laws banning gender-affirming care could be brought to the Supreme Court in the future based on the Due Process Clause of the 14th amendment, the non-discrimination protections in the Affordable Care Act (Section 1557), or other claims (KFF-Dawson 2025b).

Equity Considerations -+

  • What supports and care are available to transgender, non-binary, and questioning youth in your community or state?
  • Who benefits from restricting access to gender-affirming care? Who is harmed?

Implementation Examples -+

The U.S. does not recognize sexual and reproductive health rights as human rights (Jorge 2021).

As of November 2025, 26 states and 1 territory, largely in the South and Midwest, ban the use of gender-affirming medication and surgery for trans youth (court rulings block enforcement of the bans in 2 of them); 1 additional state bans surgical care (MAP-Medical care bans). Additionally, 24 states impose professional or legal penalties for providing gender-affirming care to those under 18 (KFF-Dawson 2025a); 6 states and 1 territory have made providing gender-affirming care to trans youth a felony (MAP-Medical care bans). In November 2025, the American Civil Liberties Union was tracking 67 bills targeting gender-affirming care, which propose implementing additional bans for trans youth while exempting the same care for youth who are cis or intersex (ACLU-LGBTQ rights map).

In contrast, 18 states and Washington, D.C. have passed “shield” laws or have executive orders protecting access to gender-affirming healthcare for anyone 13 years or older (UCLA Law-Shield laws, MAP-Shield laws). The protections offered vary, but shield laws provide legal protections to trans patients, their families, and providers who receive treatment in that state, against civil, criminal, or professional consequences from states where gender-affirming care is banned (UCLA Law-Shield laws). Additionally, 8 states provide protection regardless of the patient’s location, enabling telehealth care provision (UCLA Law-Shield laws). Additionally, there are legal challenges in 17 states to the laws limiting or banning gender-affirming care (KFF-Dawson 2025a).

The rights of all people who are transgender are increasingly being threatened. In 2019, no states had laws pre-empting transgender rights at the local level, but by the end of 2023, 24 states had preemption laws in place (LawAtlas-State preemption). As of 2025, 28 states and 4 U.S. territories have low or negative equality scores related to gender identity or gender expression, based on the number of laws in place that target and harm transgender people (MAP-Equality).

In January 2025, President Trump issued an executive order to restrict access to gender-affirming care for those under the age of 19 by eliminating support at the federal level. This includes broader nationwide directives that agencies withdraw educational and research funds from health systems that provide such services (Dowshen 2025) and more direct actions, such as attempting to eliminate coverage of gender-affirming care for youth through federally supported insurance programs like Medicaid and TRICARE (health insurance for members of the military and their families) (UCLA Law-Redfield 2025).

Implementation Resources -+

‡ Resources with a focus on equity.

A4TE-Trans health project - Advocates for Trans Equality (A4TE). (n.d.). Trans Health Project. Retrieved June 25, 2025.

ACLU-LGBTQ rights map - American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (n.d.). Mapping attacks on LGBTQ rights in U.S. State Legislatures in 2025. Retrieved June 25, 2025.

HRC-Map of Attacks on GAC - Human Rights Campaign (HRC). (n.d.). Map: Attacks on gender affirming care by state. Retrieved June 25, 2025.

LGBTQIA HEC-Affirmative Services - LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center. (2020). Affirmative services for transgender and gender diverse people – Best practices for frontline health care staff. LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center. Retrieved October 16, 2025.

LGBTQIA HEC-GA Pediatric Care Toolkit - LGBTQIA+ Health Education Center. (n.d.). Gender-affirming pediatric care toolkit. Retrieved October 16, 2025.

McNamara 2023 - McNamara, M., Abdul-Latif, H., Boulware, S. D., Kamody, R., Kuper, L. E., Olezeski, C. L., Szilagyi, N., & Alstott, A. (2023). Combating scientific disinformation on gender-affirming care. Pediatrics, 152(3), e2022060943.

NPAIHB-Leston 2020 - Leston, J., Haverkate, R., Wenger, H., Grimstad, F., Conniff, J., Wei, J., Gampa, V., Thomas, M., Jeffries, I., Jim, M., McCanta, L., & Ortega, S. (2020). Trans and gender-affirming care in IHS/tribal/urban facilities: 2020 strategic vision and action plan. Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board.

Seattle Children's Gender Clinic-Education and resources - Seattle Children’s Hospital. (n.d.). Gender Clinic—Education and resources for healthcare professionals. Retrieved October 16, 2025.

Shuster 2024 - Shuster, S. M., & McNamara, M. (2024). Troubling trends in health misinformation related to gender‐affirming care. Hastings Center Report, 54(3), 53–55.

WPATH-SOC 8 - Coleman, E., Radix, A. E., Bouman, W. P., Brown, G. R., De Vries, A. L. C., Deutsch, M. B., Ettner, R., Fraser, L., Goodman, M., Green, J., Hancock, A. B., Johnson, T. W., Karasic, D. H., Knudson, G. A., Leibowitz, S. F., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., Monstrey, S. J., Motmans, J., Nahata, L., … Arcelus, J. (2022). Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, Version 8. International Journal of Transgender Health, 23(sup1), S1–S259.

Yale Integrity Project - Yale Law School. (n.d.). The Integrity Project. Retrieved October 17, 2025.

Citations -+

* Journal subscription may be required for access.

AAMC-Boyle 2022 - Boyle, Patrick. (n.d.). What is gender-affirming care? Your questions answered. AAMC. Retrieved June 17, 2025.

AAP-Rafferty 2018 - Rafferty, J., American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP): Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, Committee on Adolescence, Section on Lesbian, G., Bisexual, and Transgender Health and Wellness. (2018). Ensuring comprehensive care and support for transgender and gender-diverse children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 142(4), e20182162.

Achille 2020 - Achille, C., Taggart, T., Eaton, N. R., Osipoff, J., Tafuri, K., Lane, A., & Wilson, T. A. (2020). Longitudinal impact of gender-affirming endocrine intervention on the mental health and well-being of transgender youths: Preliminary results. International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2020(1), 8.

ACLU-LGBTQ rights map - American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (n.d.). Mapping attacks on LGBTQ rights in U.S. State Legislatures in 2025. Retrieved June 25, 2025.

Allen 2019 - Allen, L. R., Watson, L. B., Egan, A. M., & Moser, C. N. (2019). Well-being and suicidality among transgender youth after gender-affirming hormones. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 7(3), 302–311.

Ashley 2023* - Ashley, F., Tordoff, D. M., Olson-Kennedy, J., & Restar, A. J. (2024). Randomized-controlled trials are methodologically inappropriate in adolescent transgender healthcare. International Journal of Transgender Health, 25(3), 407–418.

Azevedo 2023 - Azevedo, B., Taylor, A., & Matthews, D. (2023, July 7). Impact of gender-affirming care bans on transgender youth of color. Health Affairs.

Boyer 2022 - Boyer, T. L., Sequeira, G. M., Egan, J. E., Ray, K. N., Miller, E., & Coulter, R. W. S. (2022). Binary and nonbinary transgender adolescents’ healthcare experiences, avoidance, and well visits. Journal of Adolescent Health, 71(4), 438–445.

Carmichael 2021 - Carmichael, P., Butler, G., Masic, U., Cole, T. J., De Stavola, B. L., Davidson, S., Skageberg, E. M., Khadr, S., & Viner, R. M. (2021). Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the U.K. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0243894.

Carswell 2022 - Carswell, J. M., Lopez, X., & Rosenthal, S. M. (2022). The evolution of adolescent gender-affirming care: An historical perspective. Hormone Research in Paediatrics, 95(6), 649–656.

Cavve 2024* - Cavve, B. S., Bickendorf, X., Ball, J., Saunders, L. A., Thomas, C. S., Strauss, P., Chaplyn, G., Marion, L., Siafarikas, A., Ganti, U., Wiggins, A., Lin, A., & Moore, J. K. (2024). Reidentification with birth-registered sex in a western Australian pediatric gender clinic cohort. JAMA Pediatrics, 178(5), 446.

Chan 2023* - Chan, A., Pullen Sansfaçon, A., & Saewyc, E. (2023). Experiences of discrimination or violence and health outcomes among Black, Indigenous and People of Colour trans and/or nonbinary youth. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(5), 2004–2013.

Chelliah 2024* - Chelliah, P., Lau, M., & Kuper, L. E. (2024). Changes in gender dysphoria, interpersonal minority stress, and mental health among transgender youth after one year of hormone therapy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 74(6), 1106–1111.

Chen 2023b* - Chen, D., Berona, J., Chan, Y.-M., Ehrensaft, D., Garofalo, R., Hidalgo, M. A., Rosenthal, S. M., Tishelman, A. C., & Olson-Kennedy, J. (2023). Psychosocial functioning in transgender youth after 2 years of hormones. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(3), 240–250.

Costa 2015a* - Costa, R., Dunsford, M., Skagerberg, E., Holt, V., Carmichael, P., & Colizzi, M. (2015). Psychological support, puberty suppression, and psychosocial functioning in adolescents with gender dysphoria. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(11), 2206–2214.

Crabtree 2024* - Crabtree, L., Connelly, K. J., Guerriero, J. T., Battison, E. A. J., Tiller-Ormord, J., Sutherland, S. M., & Moyer, D. N. (2024). A more nuanced story: Pediatric gender-affirming healthcare is associated with satisfaction and confidence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 75(5), 772–779.

Dai 2024a - Dai, D., Charlton, B. M., Boskey, E. R., Hughes, L. D., Hughto, J. M. W., Orav, E. J., & Figueroa, J. F. (2024). Prevalence of gender-affirming surgical procedures among minors and adults in the US. JAMA Network Open, 7(6), e2418814.

de Vries 2011a* - de Vries, A. L. C., Steensma, T. D., Doreleijers, T. A. H., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2011). Puberty suppression in adolescents with gender identity disorder: A prospective follow-up study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(8), 2276–2283.

de Vries 2014* - de Vries, A. L. C., McGuire, J. K., Steensma, T. D., Wagenaar, E. C. F., Doreleijers, T. A. H., & Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. (2014). Young adult psychological outcome after puberty suppression and gender reassignment. Pediatrics, 134(4), 696–704.

de Vries 2023* - de Vries, A. L. C., & Hannema, S. E. (2023). Growing evidence and remaining questions in adolescent transgender care. New England Journal of Medicine, 388(3), 275–277.

Dowshen 2025* - Dowshen, N., Baker, K., Garofalo, R., Chen, D., Inwards-Breland, D. J., Sequeira, G., Mehringer, J. E., & McNamara, M. (2025). A critical scientific appraisal of the health and human services report on pediatric gender dysphoria. Journal of Adolescent Health, 77(3), 342–345.

Eisenberg 2017a* - Eisenberg, M. E., Gower, A. L., McMorris, B. J., Rider, G. N., Shea, G., & Coleman, E. (2017). Risk and protective factors in the lives of transgender/gender nonconforming adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 61(4), 521–526.

Fontanari 2020* - Fontanari, A. M. V., Vilanova, F., Schneider, M. A., Chinazzo, I., Soll, B. M., Schwarz, K., Lobato, M. I. R., & Brandelli Costa, A. (2020). Gender affirmation is associated with transgender and gender nonbinary youth mental health improvement. LGBT Health, 7(5), 237–247.

Gadomski 2024* - Gadomski, A. M., Scribani, M. B., Tallman, N., O’Bryan, J., Wolf-Gould, C., & Wolf-Gould, C. (2024). Two-year follow-up study of health-related quality of life among transgender and gender expansive youth receiving gender-affirming care. Transgender Health, 9(5), 389–398.

Garcia Gutierrez 2024* - Garcia Gutiérrez, J. M., Dusic, E., Bambilla, A. J. K., & Restar, A. J. (2024). A narrative synthesis review of legislation banning gender-affirming care. Current Pediatrics Reports, 12(3), 44–51.

Gill-Peterson 2018* - Gill-Peterson, J. (2018). Histories of the transgender child. University of Minnesota Press.

Grannis 2021a* - Grannis, C., Leibowitz, S. F., Gahn, S., Nahata, L., Morningstar, M., Mattson, W. I., Chen, D., Strang, J. F., & Nelson, E. E. (2021). Testosterone treatment, internalizing symptoms, and body image dissatisfaction in transgender boys. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 132, 105358.

Green 2022 - Green, A. E., DeChants, J. P., Price, M. N., & Davis, C. K. (2022). Association of gender-affirming hormone therapy with depression, thoughts of suicide, and attempted suicide among transgender and nonbinary youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 70(4), 643–649.

Gupta 2023* - Gupta, P., Barrera, E., Boskey, E. R., Kremen, J., & Roberts, S. A. (2023). Exploring the impact of legislation aiming to ban gender-affirming care on pediatric endocrine providers: A mixed-methods analysis. Journal of the Endocrine Society, 7(10), bvad111.

Gupta 2024* - Gupta, P., Cunha, L. M., Diego, D., & Tangpricha, V. (2024). Continuation of gender-affirming hormone therapy in transgender and gender-diverse individuals: A systematic review. Endocrine Practice, 30(12), 1206–1211.

Hembree 2017 - Hembree, W. C., Cohen-Kettenis, P. T., Gooren, L., Hannema, S. E., Meyer, W. J., Murad, M. H., Rosenthal, S. M., Safer, J. D., Tangpricha, V., & T’Sjoen, G. G. (2017). Endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons: An Endocrine Society* clinical practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 102(11), 3869–3903.

Hughes 2025* - Hughes, L. D., Charlton, B. M., Berzansky, I., & Corman, J. D. (2025). Gender-affirming medications among transgender adolescents in the US, 2018-2022. JAMA Pediatrics, 179(3), 342.

Huit 2024* - Huit, T. Z., Coyne, C., & Chen, D. (2024). State of the science: Gender-affirming care for transgender and gender diverse youth. Behavior Therapy, 55(6), 1335–1347.

Jorge 2021 - Jorge, J. C., Valerio-Pérez, L., Esteban, C., & Rivera-Lassen, A. I. (2021). Intersex care in the United States and international standards of human rights. Global Public Health, 16(5), 679–691.

Kahn 2024 - Kahn, N. F., Asante, P. G., Coker, T. R., Kidd, K. M., Christakis, D. A., Richardson, L. P., & Sequeira, G. M. (2024). Demographic differences in gender dysphoria diagnosis and access to gender-affirming care among adolescents. LGBT Health, 11(5), 348–358.

Kearns 2021 - Kearns, S., Kroll, T., O‘Shea, D., & Neff, K. (2021). Experiences of transgender and non-binary youth accessing gender-affirming care: A systematic review and meta-ethnography. PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0257194.

KFF-Dawson 2025a - Dawson, L., & Kates, J. (2025, June 18). Policy tracker: Youth access to gender affirming care and state policy restrictions. KFF.

KFF-Dawson 2025b - Dawson, L., & Sobel, L. (2025, June 18). What are the implications of the Skrmetti ruling for minors’ access to gender affirming care? KFF. Retrieved October 16, 2025.

Kuper 2020* - Kuper, L. E., Stewart, S., Preston, S., Lau, M., & Lopez, X. (2020). Body dissatisfaction and mental health outcomes of youth on gender-affirming hormone therapy. Pediatrics, 145(4), e20193006.

LawAtlas-State preemption - LawAtlas. State preemption laws in 12 domains.

Lee 2024* - Lee, W. Y., Hobbs, J. N., Hobaica, S., DeChants, J. P., Price, M. N., & Nath, R. (2024). State-level anti-transgender laws increase past-year suicide attempts among transgender and non-binary young people in the USA. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(11), 2096–2106.

MAP-Equality - Movement Advancement Project (MAP). (n.d.). Snapshot: LGBTQ equality by state. Retrieved Nobember 12, 2025.

MAP-Medical care bans - Movement Advancement Project (MAP). (n.d.). Bans on best practice medical care for transgender youth. Retrieved November 12, 2025.

MAP-Shield laws - Movement Advancement Project (MAP). (n.d.). Transgender healthcare “shield” laws. Retrieved November 13, 2025.

Matheny Antommaria 2025 - Matheny Antommaria, A. H., Kelleher, M., & Peterson, R. J. (2025). Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in American Academy of Pediatrics’ Guidelines. Pediatrics, 155(4), e2024067836.

Medina-Martinez 2021 - Medina-Martínez, J., Saus-Ortega, C., Sánchez-Lorente, M. M., Sosa-Palanca, E. M., García-Martínez, P., & Mármol-López, M. I. (2021). Health inequities in LGBT people and nursing interventions to reduce them: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(22), 11801.

Mellin 2024* - Mellin, C. S., Braun, M., Walch, A., Cohen, J. R., Kaufman, M., Seligman, M., Percelay, R., Tang, A. F., & Lee, J. Y. (2024). Pediatric gender diversity beyond the binary: An exploration of gender-affirming care for nonbinary and genderqueer youth seen over time at a single institution gender center. Transgender Health, 9(2), 107–117.

Miller 2024 - Miller, G. H., Marquez-Velarde, G., Suárez, M. I., & Glass, C. (2024). Support saves lives: Exploring the relationship between age of transition, family support, and retrospective K-12 educational experiences in transgender suicidality. Transgender Health, 9(2), 118–127.

MMWR-Suarez 2024 - Suarez, N. A. (2024). Disparities in school connectedness, unstable housing, experiences of violence, mental health, and suicidal thoughts and behaviors among transgender and cisgender high school students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023. MMWR Supplements, 73(4), 50–58.

Olson 2016* - Olson, K. R., Durwood, L., DeMeules, M., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2016). Mental health of transgender children who are supported in their identities. Pediatrics, 137(3), e20153223.

Olson 2024* - Olson, K. R., Raber, G. F., & Gallagher, N. M. (2024). Levels of satisfaction and regret with gender-affirming medical care in adolescence. JAMA Pediatrics, 178(12), 1354–1361.

Olson-Kennedy 2025* - Olson-Kennedy, J., Wang, L., Wong, C. F., Chen, D., Ehrensaft, D., Hidalgo, M. A., Tishelman, A. C., Chan, Y.-M., Garofalo, R., Radix, A. E., & Rosenthal, S. M. (2025). Emotional health of transgender youth 24 months after initiating gender-affirming hormone therapy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 77(1), 41–50.

Porsch-Ortega 2024* - Porsch-Ortega, L., Athilat, S., Kochhar, S., & McDonald, M. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to accessing and providing gender affirming hormone therapy: A scoping review. Transgender Health.

Preston 2024* - Preston, S., & Lopez, X. (2023). Legislation, medicine, and politics: Care for gender diverse youth. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes & Obesity.

Puckett 2017 - Puckett, J. A., Cleary, P., Rossman, K., Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2018). Barriers to gender-affirming care for transgender and gender nonconforming individuals. Sexuality Research & Social Policy : Journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 15(1), 48–59.

RAND-Dopp 2024 - Dopp, A. R. (2024). Interventions for gender dysphoria and related health problems in transgender and gender-expansive youth: A systematic review of benefits and risks to inform practice, policy, and research. RAND Corporation.

Reisner 2015* - Reisner, S. L., Vetters, R., Leclerc, M., Zaslow, S., Wolfrum, S., Shumer, D., & Mimiaga, M. J. (2015). Mental health of transgender youth in care at an adolescent urban community health center: A matched retrospective cohort study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(3), 274–279.

Reuters-Respaut 2022 - Respaut, R., & Terhune, C. (2022). Putting numbers on the rise in children seeking gender care. Reuters Investigates. Retrieved on November 12, 2025.

Robinson 2023 - Robinson, B. A., Stone, A. L., & Webb, J. M. (2023). Aunties, aunts, and tías: The forgotten othermother supporting and housing LGBTQ youth. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 9.

Rodriguez 2025* - Rodriguez, M., & O’Neil, J. (2025). The use of telemedicine by transgender and gender nonconforming youth. The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 21(2).

Russell 2018* - Russell, S. T., Pollitt, A. M., Li, G., & Grossman, A. H. (2018). Chosen name use is linked to reduced depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior among transgender youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 63(4), 503–505.

Salvetti 2024* - Salvetti, B., Gallagher, M., Schapiro, N. A., & Daley, A. M. (2024). Prioritizing gender-affirming care for youth: The role of pediatric-focused clinicians. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 38(2), 253–259.

Scandurra 2019 - Scandurra, C., Mezza, F., Maldonato, N. M., Bottone, M., Bochicchio, V., Valerio, P., & Vitelli, R. (2019). Health of non-binary and genderqueer people: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.

Schall 2024 - Schall, T. E., Jaffe, K., & Moses, J. D. (2024). Roles of randomized controlled trials in establishing evidence-based gender-affirming care and advancing health equity. The AMA Journal of Ethic, 26(9), E684-689.

Sequeira 2021* - Sequeira, G. M., Kidd, K. M., Coulter, R. W. S., Miller, E., Fortenberry, D., Garofalo, R., Richardson, L. P., & Ray, K. N. (2021). Transgender youths’ perspectives on telehealth for delivery of gender-affirming care. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(6), 1207–1210.

Sequeira 2023* - Sequeira, G. M., Kahn, N. F., Ricklefs, C., Collin, A., Asante, P. G., Pratt, W., Christakis, D., & Richardson, L. P. (2023). Barriers pediatric PCPs identify to providing gender-affirming care for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 73(2), 367–374.

Sequeira 2023a* - Sequeira, G. M., Guler, J., Reyes, V., Asante, P. G., Kahn, N., Anan, Y., Bocek, K., Kidd, K., Christakis, D., Pratt, W., & Richardson, L. P. (2023). Adolescent and caregiver perspectives on receiving gender-affirming care in primary care. Pediatrics, 152(4), e2023062210.

Sequeira 2025* - Sequeira, G. M., Karrington, B., Kahn, N. F., Reyes, V., Kidd, K. M., Kyweluk, M. A., Asante, P. G., Herring, N., Christakis, D. A., Pratt, W., & Richardson, L. P. (2025). Desired nonmedical gender-affirming support during adolescence among transgender and nonbinary young adults. Transgender Health, 10(1), 1–8.

Shuster 2024 - Shuster, S. M., & McNamara, M. (2024). Troubling trends in health misinformation related to gender‐affirming care. Hastings Center Report, 54(3), 53–55.

Suarez 2024 - Suarez, N. A., McKinnon, I. I., Krause, K. H., Rasberry, C. N., Pampati, S., & Underwood, J. M. (2024). Disparities in behaviors and experiences among transgender and cisgender high school students—18 U.S. states, 2021. Annals of Epidemiology, 94, 113–119.

Swan 2023* - Swan, J., Phillips, T. M., Sanders, T., Mullens, A. B., Debattista, J., & Brömdal, A. (2023). Mental health and quality of life outcomes of gender-affirming surgery: A systematic literature review. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 27(1), 2–45.

Tan 2023 - Tan, K. K. H., Byrne, J. L., Treharne, G. J., & Veale, J. F. (2023). Unmet need for gender-affirming care as a social determinant of mental health inequities for transgender youth in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Journal of Public Health, 45(2), e225–e233.

Tan 2024* - Tan H, Tang S, Yan L, et al. Global quantification of emerging and legacy per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in indoor dust: Levels, profiles and human exposure. Science of The Total Environment. 2024;927:172132.

Tankersley 2021* - Tankersley, A. P., Grafsky, E. L., Dike, J., & Jones, R. T. (2021). Risk and resilience factors for mental health among transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) youth: A systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 24(2), 183–206.

Tordoff 2022 - Tordoff, D. M., Wanta, J. W., Collin, A., Stepney, C., Inwards-Breland, D. J., & Ahrens, K. (2022). Mental health outcomes in transgender and nonbinary youths receiving gender-affirming care. JAMA Network Open, 5(2), e220978.

Turban 2020* - Turban, J. L., King, D., Carswell, J. M., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2020). Pubertal suppression for transgender youth and risk of suicidal ideation. Pediatrics, 145(2), e20191725.

Turban 2021* - Turban, J. L., King, D., Li, J. J., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2021). Timing of social transition for transgender and gender diverse youth, K-12 harassment, and adult mental health outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 69(6), 991–998.

Turban 2022 - Turban, J. L., King, D., Kobe, J., Reisner, S. L., & Keuroghlian, A. S. (2022). Access to gender-affirming hormones during adolescence and mental health outcomes among transgender adults. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0261039.

UCLA Law-Redfield 2025 - Redfield, E. (2025). Impact of ban on gender-affirming care on transgender minors. University of California, School of Law (UCLA Law): Williams Institute.

UCLA Law-Shield laws - University of California, Los Angeles School of Law (UCLA Law). (n.d.). Shield laws for reproductive and gender-affirming health care: A state law guide. Retrieved October 17, 2025.

van der Loos 2023* - Van Der Loos, M. A. T. C., Vlot, M. C., Klink, D. T., Hannema, S. E., Den Heijer, M., & Wiepjes, C. M. (2023). Bone mineral density in transgender adolescents treated with puberty suppression and subsequent gender-affirming hormones. JAMA Pediatrics, 177(12), 1332.

Van der Miesen 2020* - Van Der Miesen, A. I. R., Steensma, T. D., De Vries, A. L. C., Bos, H., & Popma, A. (2020). Psychological functioning in transgender adolescents before and after gender-affirmative care compared with cisgender general population peers. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), 699–704.

Vance 2015* - Vance, S. R., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., & Rosenthal, S. M. (2015). Health care providers’ comfort with and barriers to care of transgender youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(2), 251–253.

Vance 2023* - Vance, S. R., Chen, D., Garofalo, R., Glidden, D. V., Ehrensaft, D., Hidalgo, M., Tishelman, A., Rosenthal, S. M., Chan, Y.-M., Olson-Kennedy, J., & Sevelius, J. (2023). Mental health and gender affirmation of black and latine transgender/nonbinary youth compared to white peers prior to hormone initiation. Journal of Adolescent Health, 73(5), 880–886.

Veale 2022 - Veale, J. F., Deutsch, M. B., Devor, A. H., Kuper, L. E., Motmans, J., Radix, A. E., & Amand, C. St. (2022). Setting a research agenda in trans health: An expert assessment of priorities and issues by trans and nonbinary researchers. International Journal of Transgender Health, 23(4), 392–408.

WHO-GAC - World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Gender incongruence and transgender health in the ICD. Retrieved November 12, 2025.

Wittlin 2023 - Wittlin, N. M., Kuper, L. E., & Olson, K. R. (2023). Mental health of transgender and gender diverse youth. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 19(Volume 19, 2023), 207–232.

WPATH-SOC 8 - Coleman, E., Radix, A. E., Bouman, W. P., Brown, G. R., De Vries, A. L. C., Deutsch, M. B., Ettner, R., Fraser, L., Goodman, M., Green, J., Hancock, A. B., Johnson, T. W., Karasic, D. H., Knudson, G. A., Leibowitz, S. F., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., Monstrey, S. J., Motmans, J., Nahata, L., … Arcelus, J. (2022). Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, Version 8. International Journal of Transgender Health, 23(sup1), S1–S259.

Wuest 2024* - Wuest, J., & Last, B. S. (2024). Agents of scientific uncertainty: Conflicts over evidence and expertise in gender-affirming care bans for minors. Social Science & Medicine, 344, 116533.

Yale-McNamara 2024 - Yale Law School. (2024, July 1). White paper addresses key issues in legal battles over gender-affirming health care. Yale Law School.